GR 47917; (October, 1942)
EN BANC
G.R. No. 47917 ; October 30, 1942
PANAGAN MINING ASSOCIATION, plaintiff-appellant,
vs.
ALFREDO L. YATCO, Collector of Internal Revenue, defendant-appellee.
Agustin Alvarez Salazar for appellant.
Office of the Solicitor-General Ozaeta and Solicitor Kapunan, Jr. for appellee.
BOCOBO, J.:
1. TAXATION; EFFECT OF REPEAL OF LAW IMPOSING TAX. โ Act No 4243 imposing the tax in question was repealed on November 7, 1936, by Commonwealth Act No. 137 , and this tax was paid on December 29, 1936. It is, however, well-settled principle of taxation that taxes are due according to the law in force when they were levied, and that the rule favoring a prospective construction is appealable to statutes repealing tax lay.
2. ID; EFFECT OF NON-PAYMENT OF TAX IN QUESTION. โ The tax under Act No. 4243 is not a kind of privilege tax the non-payment of which merely causes the loss of the privilege of obtaining the patent to mining claims. A reading of Act No. 4243 shows that this tax must necessarily be paid by every locator of a mining claim who does not do any assessment work in any given year, regardless of whether or not he subsequently continues fulfilling all the requirements for securing a patent. This is to insure good faith on the part of locators.
Batas Pinas
